He engaged and participated in blasphemous acts of of heresy, one in particular a Jewish ceremony wearing a yarmulke on his head. There are his physical acts as well as his verbal acts, all recorded, all by his own doing and his own words so people cannot say anything is altered made up or that this is a conspiracy against the Catholic Faith. Sadly, tragically this is true.
1. Bergoglio's election represents a total victory for the forces of Angelo "Cardinal" Sodano, the Occupy Vatican Movement's Secretary of State and his successor, Tarcisio "Cardinal" Bertone, both of whom desired a successor to Ratzinger/Benedict who would not undertake any serious reform of the curia. (Meaning the abolishing of the heretical council of Vatican II.
2. Of all the unthinkable candidates, Jorge Mario Bergoglio is perhaps the worst. Not because he openly professes doctrines against the faith and morals, but because, judging from his work as Archbishop of Buenos Aires, faith and moral seem to have been irrelevant to him by his own
3.A sworn enemy of the Traditional Mass, he has only allowed imitations of it in the hands of declared enemies of the ancient liturgy. He has persecuted every single priest who made an effort to wear a cassock, preach with firmness, or that was simply interested in Summorum Pontificum.
4. His entourage in the Buenos Aires Curia, with the exception of a few clerics, has not been characterized by the virtue of their actions. Several are under grave suspicion of moral misbehavior.
Now we have HIS own words:
BERGOGLIO: Staying, remaining faithful implies an outgoing. Precisely if one remains in the Lord one goes out of oneself. Paradoxically precisely because one remains, precisely if one is faithful one changes. One does not remain faithful, like the traditionalists or the fundamentalists, to the letter. Fidelity is always a change, a blossoming, a growth. The Lord brings about a change in those who are faithful to Him. That is Catholic doctrine. Saint Vincent of Lerins makes the comparison between the biological development of the person, between the person who grows, and the Tradition which, in handing on the depositum fidei from one age to another, grows and consolidates with the passage of time.Here is a question asked of the then Cardinal Bergoglio:
Q, What should one do?
BERGOGLIO: Look at our people not for what it should be but for what it is and see what is necessary. Without preconceptions and recipes but with generous openness. For the wounds and the frailty God spoke. Allowing the Lord to speak… In a world that we can’t manage to interest with the words we say, only His presence that loves us, saves us, can be of interest. The apostolic fervor renews itself in order to testify to Him who has loved us from the beginning. Q. For you, then, what is the worst thing that can happen in the Church?
BERGOGLIO: It is what De Lubac calls spiritual worldliness.(Lubac the false priest/cardinal that shaped the Nouvelle Théologie French for "New Theology" liberal theology or Liberal Catholic Theology Along with Karl Rahner that was condemned by Pope Pius XII in Humani Generis. So here we have a heretic as a now pope that agreed with Nouvelle Théologie that was condemned by Pope Pius XII) It is the greatest danger for the Church, for us, who are in the Church. (It is worse), says De Lubac, more disastrous than the infamous leprosy that disfigured the dearly beloved Bride at the time of the libertine popes. Spiritual worldliness is putting oneself at the center. It is what Jesus saw going on among the Pharisees: (You who glorify yourselves. Who give glory to yourselves, the ones to the others) Generous openness to what? The devil, that's what.
Quoting De Lubac on spiritual worldliness, which means ridding the Catholic Church of the belief that she alone possesses the truth and has the sole right from God to teach, govern and sanctify men?
I do want to say one thing that is imperative. Jesus Himself said the gates of hell shall not prevail against His Holy Church that is true and I believe that with all my heart. But there will be false prophets, and people, the flock will be misled, if we allow ourselves to be misled by false prophets we commit mortal sin, while our bodies are mortal the souls God gave to us are immortal thus subject to punishment eternal. Will our souls prevail the gates of hell? Not if we follow a false prophet even if he is the earthly head of the catholic faith, the Holy Catholic Church will prevail over the gates of hell but not the false prophet nor those that allow themselves to follow him. Thus Saith Jesus: John 10:4-5 And when he hath let out his own sheep, he goeth before them: and the sheep follow him, because they know his voice. But a stranger they follow not, but fly from him, because they know not the voice of strangers. Let that be our guide and may the Holy Spirit guide us to know the proper time and the person we are to fly from May God Bless us All And God Bless America